Here's a good convo we can begin. A few months ago after hard prayer and exegeting scripture I came to the conclusion that dispensationalism is incorrect.
So I no longer hold to a Pre-mill Dispensational, some well known-characters of this view are (stephen the levite--'check out his song "My Funerals Sound-Track"--An impressive song about his eschatology, John Macarthur, Steve Lawson, Tim Layhe...etc)
I can see a mill reign of Christ but, I can't create a distinction between Israel and the church (hence, dispensationalism). In other words, each group is saved the same, but God has different plans for the Jews and Gentiles.
Instead I believe Historic Pre-mill makes the most sense. (which is held by the likes of : John Piper, D.A Carson, Thomas Schriener, George Ladd, James Boice, (possibly Shai Linne--In his song "In Adam all Die" he makes a reference to the covenant of works this immediately makes him not a dispensationalist. But, in "Jesus is alive" he makes a reference to the mill reign of Christ. When the two are combined it only makes sense he is a Historic Pre-mill.)
Which states their is no distinction between Israel and the church, but they are one in the same. There are no specific promises given to Israel because they have been fulfilled (not replaced!) in the church.
what do you think? Dispensational or Covenental?